12,637 papers · updated 10 Oct 2026livingmeta.ai
← Browse all papers
Research theme

Scholarly Publishing

The Scholarly Publishing theme comprises 113 papers in this corpus published between 2004 and 2026. Work here is dominated by Empirical Study, Literature Review, Position Paper. 5 open research gaps have been surfaced in this area.

Methodology profile

  • Empirical Study20 (18%)
  • Literature Review18 (16%)
  • Position Paper17 (15%)
  • Content Analysis11 (10%)
  • Conceptual11 (10%)
  • Design Science10 (9%)

Research domains

  • Scholarly Infrastructure97 (86%)
  • Peer Review8 (7%)
  • Academic Writing3 (3%)
  • Knowledge Synthesis1 (1%)

Frequent sub-topics

Generative AI impacts on journals, conferences, and peer review systems · 1Editorial diplomacy: conflict management, ethics, and AI in academic publishing · 1AI governance in publishing, provenance and disclosure · 1faculty publication monitoring system using API · 1LLM applications in health care communication · 1open access advantage in citation and altmetrics over time · 1citation patterns and source grounding in LLM-generated brand information · 1AI-driven patient-friendly radiology report generation · 1

Open research gaps

  • The authors identify gaps in CONSORT guideline compliance: RCTs "often have incomplete methods reporting despite widespread adoption of the CONSORT guideline." They propose that this LLM-based approac
  • The abstract does not explicitly identify future research directions or gaps. However, the title posits a research question: "can and should AI enable a new paradigm of scientific knowledge sharing?"
  • The authors identify that as generative AI adoption evolves and retrieval/drafting systems become more widely deployed, the pressure on OA visibility may intensify, with particular implications for un
  • Not explicitly stated in abstract
  • The paper identifies the need for best practices and strategies for authors and publishers navigating the OA landscape, the importance of addressing sustainability concerns for smaller publishers, the

Representative papers