12,637 papers · updated 10 Oct 2026livingmeta.ai
← Browse all papers
Research theme

Hallucination Control

The Hallucination Control theme comprises 1,017 papers in this corpus published between 2014 and 2026. Work here is dominated by Experimental, Empirical Study, Benchmarking. 5 open research gaps have been surfaced in this area.

Methodology profile

  • Experimental249 (24%)
  • Empirical Study244 (24%)
  • Benchmarking149 (15%)
  • Design Science94 (9%)
  • Literature Review85 (8%)
  • Conceptual64 (6%)

Research domains

  • Research Integrity730 (72%)
  • Bias & Epistemic Risk130 (13%)
  • Data Analysis65 (6%)
  • Knowledge Synthesis23 (2%)
  • Academic Writing14 (1%)
  • Literature Discovery10 (1%)

Frequent sub-topics

detection of AI-generated survey responses from large language models · 1moral consistency in LLM decision-making under prompt perturbations · 1Generative AI integrity in academic publishing; human-AI boundaries · 1wisdom of crowds approach with LLM agents for fraud detection · 1abductive reasoning evaluation in LLMs · 1algorithmic bias in AI-based clinical decision systems · 1LLM hallucination detection and mitigation via system reliability theory · 1structural biases in LLM-as-a-Judge systems · 1

Open research gaps

  • Not explicitly stated in abstract
  • Future studies should incorporate real-world clinical scenarios to further evaluate LLM capabilities and limitations in medical contexts.
  • The authors identify that "existing benchmarks often lack a realistic clinical context and provide limited insight into how hallucinations can be mitigated in practice," which motivated development of
  • The authors identify open problems for achieving metacognitive awareness in LLMs. Specifically, they highlight that for direct interaction, "acting on uncertainty means communicating it honestly; for
  • Not explicitly stated in the provided abstract.

Representative papers

← Browse all papersPriority research agenda →