← Browse all papers
Research theme
AI Manuscript Writing
The AI Manuscript Writing theme comprises 666 papers in this corpus published between 2001 and 2026. Work here is dominated by Mixed Methods, Literature Review, Experimental. 5 open research gaps have been surfaced in this area.
Methodology profile
- Mixed Methods92 (14%)
- Literature Review77 (12%)
- Experimental76 (11%)
- Empirical Study73 (11%)
- Case Study68 (10%)
- Qualitative62 (9%)
Research domains
- Academic Writing642 (96%)
- Human-AI Collaboration10 (2%)
- Doctoral Training4 (1%)
- Scholarly Infrastructure3 (0%)
- Research Productivity2 (0%)
- Research Integrity2 (0%)
Frequent sub-topics
Generative AI in Korean language learning; responsible classroom integration · 1technology-enhanced writing instruction for EFL learners with GenAI integration · 1GenAI in academic writing: governance, agency, integrity · 1GenAI-assisted grading and automated assessment feedback · 1GenAI for multimodal assessment artifacts and non-disposable learning outputs · 1LLMs in English language teaching lesson planning; affordances and challenges · 1generative AI for teaching writing and developing teacher digital competence · 1machine translation of literary texts; stylometric analysis of GPT-4 vs human translation · 1
Open research gaps
- Not explicitly stated in the abstract
- The authors identify several future research directions: (1) More extensive focus on ethical dimensions of AI-assisted authorship and scientific writing; (2) Exploration of how concepts such as origin
- The study addresses an underexplored gap: "a direct comparison between ChatGPTs, ERNIE, and SPARK (pretrained with dominant Chinese Corpus, referred to herein as C-dominant LLMs) remains underexplored
- The authors identify gaps in understanding how practitioners approach plain language work, what standards guide their judgments, and whether current evaluation metrics align with their priorities. The
- not_reported
Representative papers
- Human-AI collaboration patterns in AI-assisted academic writingAndy Nguyen · 2024 · 301 citations
- Using AI to write scholarly publicationsMohammad Hosseini · 2023 · 264 citations
- Disclosing generative AI use for writing assistance should be voluntaryMohammad Hosseini · 2025 · 12 citations
- ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial Intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishingBrady Lund · 2023 · 769 citations
- Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writingJinhee Kim · 2024 · 298 citations
- Generative AI: is it a paradigm shift for higher education?Xianghan O’Dea · 2024 · 110 citations
- Generative AI and higher education: a review of claims from the first months of ChatGPTLasse X Jensen · 2024 · 94 citations
- Delving into LLM-assisted writing in biomedical publications through excess vocabularyDmitry Kobak · 2025 · 90 citations