12,445 papers · continuously updated · last export: 10 Aug 2026livingmeta.ai
← Browse all papers
AI evidence extraction

Unlocking the Power of ChatGPT: A Framework for Applying Generative AI in Education

Jiahong Su, Weipeng Yang · ECNU Review of Education · 2023

AI-generated evidence extraction, verified across multiple analytical personas. Not a substitute for the peer-reviewed original.

6/10
Relevance
1/4
Quality (LMQS)
I
Evidence
550
Citations
19.48
FWCI
Top 10%
Impact

This is an AI analysis. Read the peer-reviewed original at the publisher: https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168423

Methodology & findings

Study design

Theoretical framework development with literature-based analysis.

Main result

The study found that "the benefits of using ChatGPT in education or more generally, educative AI, include a more personalized and efficient learning experience for students as well as easier and faster feedback for teachers." However, the authors also identified that "challenges such as the untested effectiveness of the technology, limitations in the quality of data, and ethical and safety concerns must also be considered."

Reports effect sizes.

Research paradigm

Interpretivist/Argumentative

Author conclusions

The authors conclude that "This study explored the opportunities and challenges of using ChatGPT in education within the proposed theoretical framework." The work emphasizes that while generative AI has potential to "revolutionize education," implementation requires careful attention to desired outcomes, automation levels, ethical considerations, and effectiveness evaluation through the proposed IDEE framework.

Open questions raised

  • The authors identify the need for further evaluation of ChatGPT's effectiveness in education, improved data quality standards, and more comprehensive ethical and safety guidelines for implementing AI in educational settings.
  • The paper identifies the need for further research on: (1) the effectiveness of ChatGPT technology in educational settings, as effectiveness is described as "untested"; (2) solutions to address data quality limitations; (3) approaches to managing ethical and safety concerns in educational AI deployment.
  • The paper identifies that "the untested effectiveness of the technology" represents a significant gap requiring further investigation in real educational settings.
Data: not_statedCode: not_statedExtracted from: pdfAgreement 81%

Explore related topics

Related papers