AI evidence extraction

Revolutionizing education with AI: Exploring the transformative potential of ChatGPT

Tufan Adıgüzel, Mehmet Haldun Kaya, Fatih Kürşat Cansu · Contemporary Educational Technology · 2023

AI-generated evidence extraction, verified across multiple analytical personas. Not a substitute for the peer-reviewed original.

6/10

Relevance

2/4

Quality (LMQS)

Evidence

858

Citations

138.33

FWCI

Top 10%

Impact

This is an AI analysis. Read the peer-reviewed original at the publisher: https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13152

Methodology & findings

Study design

Narrative literature review synthesizing existing academic literature on AI applications in education, with emphasis on chatbots and ChatGPT.

Main result

The study found that AI technologies, particularly chatbots and ChatGPT, have "considerable potential to improve learning, teaching, pedagogical innovations, assessment, and educational administration." The review demonstrates that "a primary result of implementing AI is increased motivation and engagement" for students, and that "AI-powered tools like ALEKS and Knewton create individualized learning paths" tailored to learners' unique strengths and weaknesses. Additionally, the authors note that "ChatGPT's ability to understand natural language queries and generate human-like responses has made it a popular tool for getting quick answers to a wide variety of questions, from common to complex topics."

Research paradigm

Interpretivist/Hermeneutic

Author conclusions

"A collaborative effort involving educators, researchers, and policy-makers is needed to ensure the ethical and responsible use of AI in education. We can build a more fair and successful education system that gives kids the individualized teaching, feedback, and support they need by solving the problems posed by AI technologies and utilizing their advantages."

Risk of bias

Lack of systematic search protocol increases selection bias; No quantitative synthesis or meta-analysis to assess overall effects; Predominantly positive framing of benefits without balanced treatment of harms; Limited discussion of implementation barriers and contextual factors; Selection bias: Non-systematic literature selection may favor positive or recent publications on AI in education; Publication bias: Likely inclusion of published peer-reviewed work while excluding negative or neutral findings from grey literature; Confirmation bias: Authors' framing may emphasize benefits while addressing limitations separately; Geographic bias: Potential overrepresentation of English-language publications and Western educational contexts; Selection bias in literature reviewed (non-systematic review methodology); Publication bias (likely positive results published); Potential confirmation bias in interpreting AI benefits; Limited critical appraisal of source quality in narrative review

Limitations

The authors acknowledge that "the influence of AI on education is still uncertain" and that "research on AIEd also reveals a weak link to pedagogical perspectives and instructional approaches, and overlooks the intricate and multifaceted challenges and risks involved in learning and teaching with AI." Additionally, they note that "insufficient familiarity with these technologies poses challenges to their introduction and integration into educational institutions."

Open questions raised

The authors identify that further research is necessary to "ascertain the potential benefits of these emerging technologies for education and how they can be properly and effectively utilized for the purpose of differentiating text-and idea-generation." They also note the need to determine "to what extent ChatGPT can revolutionize education, thereby necessitating further inquiry and exploration." Additionally, the paper highlights the need for research addressing equity, accessibility, bias mitigation, and the integration of AI with pedagogical theories.
Weak link between AIEd research and pedagogical perspectives and instructional approaches
Overlooked intricate and multifaceted challenges and risks in learning and teaching with AI
Need for further research on potential benefits of emerging AI technologies in education
Need for research on proper and effective utilization of ChatGPT and similar tools in educational settings
Gap in understanding how to differentiate text and idea-generation through AI

Data: Data generated or analysed during this study are available from the authors on request; no specific datasets or repositories are linked.; Data generated or analysed during this study are available from the authors on requestCode: None mentioned.Extracted from: pdfAgreement 76%

Explore related topics

Responsible AI Use Doctoral Training Literature Review